# Visual understanding of centripetal acceleration formula | Physics | Khan Academy

Let’s say I have
some object that’s traveling in a circular
path just like this. And what I’ve drawn here
is its velocity vector at different points
along that path. And so this right over
here is going to be v1, velocity vector 1. This is going to be
velocity vector 2. And this right over here is
going to be velocity vector 3. And what we’re going to
assume, in this video, is that the magnitude of these
velocity vectors is constant. Or another way to think about it
is that the speed is constant. So I’ll just say lowercase
v without the arrow on top– so this is going to be a scalar
quantity– I’ll call this the speed. Or you could call this the
magnitude of these vectors. And this is going
to be constant. So this is going to be equal
to the magnitude of vector 1, which is equal to the
magnitude of vector 2. The direction is
clearly changing, but the magnitude is going
to be the same, which is equal to the
magnitude of vector 3. And we’re going to assume
that it’s traveling in a path, in a circle with radius r. And what I’m going
to do is, I’m going to draw a position
vector at each point. So let’s call r1– actually I’ll
just do it in pink– let’s call r1 that right over there. That’s position vector r1. That is position vector r2. So the position is
clearly changing. That’s position vector r2. And that is position vector r3. But the magnitude of
our position vectors are clearly the same. And I’m going to call the
magnitude of our position vectors r. And that’s just the
radius of the circle. It’s this distance
right over here. So r is equal to
the magnitude of r1, which is equal to the
magnitude of r2, which is equal to the magnitude of r3. Now what I want to
do, in this video, is prove to you visually,
that given this radius and given this speed,
that the magnitude of the centripetal
acceleration– and I’ll just write that as a sub c,
I don’t have an arrow on top, so this is a scalar quantity. So the magnitude of the
centripetal acceleration is going to be equal
to our speed squared, our constant speed
squared, divided by the radius of the circle. I want you to feel good
that this is indeed the case by the
end of this video. And to understand
that, what I want to do is I want to re-plot
these velocity vectors on another
circle and just think about how the vectors
themselves are changing. So let’s copy and paste this. So let me copy and paste v1. So copy and paste. So that is v– actually I
want to do it from the center –so that is v1. Then let me do the
same thing for v2. So let me copy and paste it. That is v2. And then let me
do it also for v3. I’ll just get the vector part;
I don’t have to get the label. So copy and paste it. And that right over
there is vector v3. And let me clean
this up a little bit. So that’s clearly v2. I don’t think we have
to label anymore. We know that v2 is in orange. And what is the
radius of this circle going to be right over here? Well, the radius
of this circle is going to be the magnitude
of the velocity vectors. And we already know the
magnitude of the velocity vectors is this quantity
v, this scalar quantity. So the radius of this circle is
v. The radius of this circle, we already know, is equal to r. And just as the
velocity vector is what’s giving us the
change in position over time, the change in
position vector over time, what’s the vector
that’s going to give us the change in our
velocity vector over time? Well, that’s going to be
our acceleration vectors. So you will have
some acceleration. We’ll call this a1. We’ll call this a2. And I’ll call this a3. And I want to make
sure that you get the analogy that’s
going on here. As we go around in this
circle, the position vectors first they point out
to the left, then the upper, kind of in a maybe
11 o’clock position, or I guess the top left,
and then to the top. So it’s pointing in these
different directions like a hand in a clock. And what’s moving it
along there is the change in position vector
over time, which are these velocity vectors. Over here, the velocity
vectors are moving around like the hands of a clock. And what is doing
the moving around are these acceleration vectors. And over here, the
velocity vectors are tangential to the
path, which is a circle. They’re perpendicular
to a radius. And you learned
that in geometry– that a line that is
tangent to a circle is perpendicular to a radius. And it’s also going to be the
same thing right over here. And just going back
to what we learned when we learned
about the intuition of centripetal acceleration, if
you look at a1 right over here, and you translate this vector,
it’ll be going just like that. It is going towards the center. a2, once again, is going
towards the center. a3, once again, if
you translate that, that is going
towards the center. So all of these are actually
center-seeking vectors. And you see that
right over here. These are actually centripetal
acceleration vectors right over here. Here we’re talking about
just the magnitude of it. And we’re going to
assume that all of these have the same magnitude. So we’re going to
assume that they all have a magnitude of
what we’ll call a sub c. So that’s the magnitude. And it’s equal to
the magnitude of a1. That vector, it’s equal
to the magnitude of a2. And it’s equal to
the magnitude of a3. Now what I want to think
about is how long is it going to take for
this thing to get from this point on the circle
to that point on that circle right over there? So the way to think about it
is, what’s the length of the arc that it traveled? The length of this arc that
it traveled right over there. That’s 1/4 around the circle. It’s going to be 1/4
of the circumference. The circumference is 2 pi r. It Is going to be 1/4 of that. So that is the
length of the arc. And then how long will
it take it to go that? Well, you would
divide the length of your path divided by the
actual speed, the actual thing that’s nudging it
along that path. So you want to divide that by
the magnitude of your velocity, or your speed. This is the magnitude of
velocity, not velocity. This is not a vector right
over here, this is a scalar. So this is going to be the
time to travel along that path. Now the time to
travel along this path is going to be the exact
same amount of time it takes to travel along this
path for the velocity vector. So this is for the position
vector to travel like that. This is for the velocity
vector to travel like that. So it’s going to be
the exact same T. And what is the
length of this path? And now think of it in the
purely geometrical sense. We’re looking at a circle here. The radius of the circle
is v. So the length of this path right over
here is going to be 1/4. It is going to be– I’ll
do it in that same color so you see the analogy–
it’s equal to 1/4 times the circumference of the circle. The circumference of
this circle is 2 pi times the radius of the
circle, which is v. Now what is nudging
it along this circle? What is nudging it
along this path? What is the analogy for
speed right over here? Speed is what’s nudging it
along the path over here. It is the magnitude of
the velocity vector. So what’s nudging it along
this arc right over here is the magnitude of the
acceleration vector. So it is going to be a sub c. And these times are going
to be the exact same thing. The amount of time it
takes for this vector to go like that, for
the position vector, is the same amount of
time it takes the velocity vector to go like that. So we can set these 2
things equal each other. So we get, on this side,
we get 1/4 2 pi r over v is equal to 1/4 2 pi v over the
magnitude of our acceleration vector. And now we can simplify
it a little bit. We can divide both sides by 1/4. Get rid of that. We can divide both sides
by 2 pi, get rid of that. Let me rewrite it. So then we get r/v
is equal to v over the centripetal acceleration. And now you can cross multiply. And so you get v
times v. So I’m just cross multiplying right
over here. v times v, you get v squared, is
equal to a c times r. And cross multiplying, remember,
is really just the same thing as multiplying both sides
by both denominators, by multiplying both
sides times v and ac. So it’s not some magical thing. If you multiply both sides times
v and ac, these v’s cancel out. These ac’s cancel out. You get v times v is v squared,
is equal to a sub c times r. And now to solve
for the magnitude of our centripetal
acceleration, you just divide both sides by r. And you are left
with– and I guess we’ve earned a drum
roll now– the magnitude of our centripetal
acceleration is equal to the magnitude,
our constant magnitude of our velocity. So this right here
is our speed, divided by the radius of the circle. And we’re done!

## 80 thoughts on “Visual understanding of centripetal acceleration formula | Physics | Khan Academy”

1. Leena S says:

1st?

2. WATTTTUUURRRRTHOOOOOOOZE says:

such a BOSS!

3. amin mozel says:

I still don't understand 🙁

4. Rimon Seyoum says:

I get it all, just wondering why the Time to travel 1/4 of both circumferences is the same?

5. nhmllr725 says:

@riimzo There is only one velocity vector on the circle for every position vector. If you know it's position, you know it's velocity. So if the position changes at a rate, the velocity vectors much change at the same rate.

6. Rimon Seyoum says:

@nhmllr725 Ohh.. Alright thanks 🙂

7. nhmllr725 says:

@riimzo No problem. ;p

8. Charles says:

@khanacademy what program do you use to draw in these videos?

9. raydredX says:

@PmQable1 It's useful to describe the change in direction of bodies. Especially when they have paths like circles and ellipses. No?

10. R Msr says:

That's great I miss getting your VHS everyday, Salmon, are you okay?

11. disturbedlol says:

I don't understand a shit about what you are painting or talking about.. but it's fun to look at ur videos 🙂

12. Matthew Kunihiro says:

I got my degree at Khan Academy!

13. G. Hoffman says:

Thanks Sal!

14. amin mozel says:

Brilliant!

15. WHY70122 says:

This is awesome. Now I understand where this equation comes from. For those of you guys who will take Dynamics in the future, you better learn this stuff clearly cuz your gonna bump into it again in Curvilinear motion in Dynamics. I didn't understand anything about that kind of motion at first cuz my professor skipped the Centripetal Acceleration section when we were in Phys 1… I think i got it now 😀

you're awesome

beautiful intuition and explanation! Thank you!

18. biochem86 says:

i like sal he not only explains thing good but being able to have a clear and concise illustration of what your talking about as you mention it is important in my opinion

19. 09lvlyppz says:

Your accent is kind of distracting

20. TheAlphaRalph says:

OH MY FRIGGEN GLOB THANK YOU SO MUCH. This was beautiful.

21. Benjamin Neufeld says:

wait how did the velocity get to be the velocity?

22. Benjamin Neufeld says:

and to find the time to go the second half why not just use the first formula

23. Goliath Stone says:

I get it now thanks!. Also, during class, I always have to stop listening to my professor to think about what she is saying. Ex. "The direction of velocity is moving in clockwise rotation." But when this guy says "like hands on a clock," less thinking needs to be done on my part. Many thanks.

24. Aditya Joshi says:

Why is the radius of the second circle is the magnitude of the velocity?

25. Codo Sacho says:

i wonder why there is acceleration ??

26. Montagne says:

like if you actually did a drum roll 🙂

27. Arshmah Siddiqui says:

this was such an awesome video!!

28. alissom says:

Thank You! I've been looking for while to find this

29. Bimbar says:

Just someone from 2015 passing through

30. orchoose says:

great explanation

31. Abdurrehman farooq says:

AM I CORRECT?
if we assume that angle is small so that arc lenght is flat hence equal to Δv so that velocity x θ = Δv and then dividing both sides with t gives Δv / t = velocity x θ/ t as θ / t = w hence Δv/t = a = velocity x w

32. strahinja nikolic says:

Why would first T and second T be the same?

33. Glenn Reece says:

THANKS A MILLION! REALLY LOVE HOW YOU TEACH!

34. YAHOO says:

So if there is a change in direction there is an acceleration??
How come there is an acceleration, if the magnitude is constant? aren't you gonna get zero or there is an exception in circular motion?

35. shah yash says:

Hi Sal, can you explain me why does the velocity vector and radius vector takes equal time period to travel 1/4circle ??

36. Enlightenment says:

torsion

37. e no says:

the black screen makes harder to see

38. Dan Varlan says:

AND WE'RE DONE!!!

39. Érchegyi Dávid says:

Sorry, this didn't help at all, too many questions during the video, it might be my lack of knowledge on the subject

40. Jonah Fox says:

this was extremely intuitive and interesting. Thank You Khan Academy!

41. DDC ll says:

just started physics 12, thank you so much for making my life easier

42. Shreoshi Roy says:

Really great and innovative derivation without using calculus.

43. Aman Messinezis says:

Why do you repeat yourself constantly?

44. Ryan Ward says:

What does the second circle represent? In what case do velocities come from the origin? Or does the second circle just represent the first circle with the forces redrawn?

45. Ricochet Rob says:

I feel so much I understand it now

46. cover up says:

If there is a nobel prize for education, this guy deserves it 🙂

47. Kavish Shah says:

so interesting……

48. Elango Elango says:

It was not nice for the study of physics

49. Shubham Gund says:

thxx buddy it really helped mee…..😜

50. Rodney James says:

This helped so much! Thank you!

51. sumit kumar says:

My new PHYSICS SOLVING APP.More then 150+ formulas,Solves for any variable you want,Covers up all physics.download now.https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.physics.lenovo.myapplication

52. Ivin Inasu Chungath says:

53. Peng Chen says:

I don't know what to say.

54. Eyal Oged says:

Wow thank you so much, I was staring at my notebook trying to visualize why would that make sense, and I couldn't get anything at all, this is perfectly what I tried to look up

55. Talal Alam says:

I dont get it
Why Khan!!?????
😂 😂 😬❓❓❓

56. Drake Danos says:

Why draw an acceleration vector tangent to a velocity vector?

57. Trevor Wills says:

Thank you so much for this video

58. Angie M says:

I have never been so confused in my life

59. UnwantedTachyon says:

Why is the time same in both cases

60. Azaezal belthood says:

Sir Ur a legend.thank you so much.

61. sebastian cuello says:

physics is crazy bro. I understand this video but it also got me thinking why does nature work this way? like think about it… you have an object moving at a constant speed in a circle and that object has a force pushing it towards the center of the circle. The only reason why it doesn't come crashing towards the center is because the force tangent to the circle is greater. Like bruh if that isn't crazy then idk what is.

62. Surinder Singh Rawal says:

5:42 why are the centripetal acceleration vectors perpendicular to velocity?

63. qualquan says:

OMG such a complicated geometric derivation
xmtutor does a much better job

64. Amin Saraj says:

please sir let me know why the velocity is supposed to be constant

65. EVELIN ELSA says:

THANK YOU …THIS HELPED ME A LOT

66. Philip Y says:

Sal is STILL THE BEST!!.. thank you!!… perfect VIDEO from beginning to end!! they don't get any better than this video!

67. Dhruva Kashyap says:

Are you God?

68. RaccoonCityMassacreOfficial says:

wait a second i thought acceleration was a vector quantity?? 2:03

69. Gughan Mali says:

Is 4π²r/T² another formula for centripetal acceleration?

70. Drake Danos says:

All the centripetal acceleration is is the vertical component of a parabolic motion. To understand, let me use satellites as an example. The curvature of earth drops about 16 feet every 5 miles. Every single object which falls on earth, (excluding air resistance), falls almost exactly 16 feet after the first second of free fall. If an object is launched at 5 mi/s just above the surface of earth, it will cover 5 miles horizontally after one second and 16 feet vertically after one second. Any other circular motion is just the same. The earth is so big and the horizontal speed is so small relative to its size that the vertical componet/ centripetal acceleration is noticeable. Zooming in on any circular motion object, and slowing down time, the vertical component is noticeable.

71. Ayoob Alkindy says:

Stil I am not able to understand how he got this equation

72. Love Effect says:

Samjh me nahi aaya

73. Mr. Yuri Inspector says:

Woo!

74. Iri Miriam says:

Pfffff look at this guy thinking we remember geometry…..

75. FiraMirak says:

Mind blowing sal. Thank you

76. FiraMirak says:

Who says videos from 2011 doesn't help?

77. Maya Raysin says:

Why is the time (T) in the left circle is the same as the one in the right? Like, how can we compare the change in the velocity vector direction and the acceleration vector direction?

78. Bo Zhao says:

r, v and a are considered by only magnitude (they are constant) and the direction change that respect to time is neglected. In this sense, the change of r , v are just position changes, in the track of motion, which is arc length. It is very good interpretation for the uniformly centripetal acceleration formula. It is indeed a miss for physics lectures that are supposed to cover. Thank you for teaching me something new that is an important formula derive in physics.

79. Nahshal Edappally says:

I didnt get the transfer of acceleration vector to first circle

80. Sivanathan Vithurshan says:

thanks