# Triple integrals 1 | Double and triple integrals | Multivariable Calculus | Khan Academy

Let’s say I wanted to find the
volume of a cube, where the values of the cube– let’s say
x is between– x is greater than or equal to 0, is less
than or equal to, I don’t know, 3. Let’s say y is greater than
or equal to 0, and is less than or equal to 4. And then let’s say that z is
greater than or equal to 0 and is less than or equal to 2. And I know, using basic
geometry you could figure out– you know, just multiply the
width times the height times the depth and you’d
have the volume. But I want to do this example,
just so that you get used to what a triple integral looks
like, how it relates to a double integral, and then later
in the next video we could do something slightly
more complicated. So let’s just draw
that, this volume. So this is my x-axis, this is
my z-axis, this is the y. x, y, z. OK. So x is between 0 and 3. So that’s x is equal to 0. This is x is equal to–
let’s see, 1, 2, 3. y is between 0 and 4. 1, 2, 3, 4. So the x-y plane will look
something like this. The kind of base of our cube
will look something like this. And then z is between 0 and 2. So 0 is the x-y plane,
and then 1, 2. So this would be the top part. And maybe I’ll do that in a
slightly different color. So this is along the x-z axis. You’d have a boundary
here, and then it would come in like this. You have a boundary here,
come in like that. A boundary there. So we want to figure out
the volume of this cube. And you could do it. You could say, well, the depth
is 3, the base, the width is 4, so this area is 12
times the height. 12 times 2 is 24. You could say it’s 24
cubic units, whatever units we’re doing. But let’s do it as
a triple integral. So what does a triple
integral mean? Well, what we could do is we
could take the volume of a very small– I don’t want to say
area– of a very small volume. So let’s say I wanted to take
the volume of a small cube. Some place in this– in the
volume under question. And it’ll start to make more
sense, or it starts to become a lot more useful, when we have
variable boundaries and surfaces and curves
as boundaries. But let’s say we want to
figure out the volume of this little, small cube here. That’s my cube. It’s some place in this larger
cube, this larger rectangle, cubic rectangle, whatever
you want to call it. So what’s the volume
of that cube? Let’s say that its width is dy. So that length
right there is dy. It’s height is dx. Sorry, no, it’s
height is dz, right? The way I drew it,
z is up and down. And it’s depth is dx. This is dx. This is dz. This is dy. So you can say that a small
volume within this larger volume– you could call that
dv, which is kind of the volume differential. And that would be equal to,
you could say, it’s just the width times the
length times the height. dx times dy times dz. And you could switch the
orders of these, right? Because multiplication is
associative, and order doesn’t matter and all that. But anyway, what can you
do with it in here? Well, we can take the integral. All integrals help us do is
help us take infinite sums of infinitely small distances,
like a dz or a dx or a dy, et cetera. So, what we could do is we
could take this cube and first, add it up in, let’s
say, the z direction. So we could take that cube and
then add it along the up and down axis– the z-axis–
so that we get the volume of a column. So what would that look like? Well, since we’re going up and
down, we’re adding– we’re taking the sum in
the z direction. We’d have an integral. And then what’s the
lowest z value? Well, it’s z is equal to 0. And what’s the upper bound? Like if you were to just take–
keep adding these cubes, and keep going up, you’d run
into the upper bound. And what’s the upper bound? It’s z is equal to 2. And of course, you would
take the sum of these dv’s. And I’ll write dz first. Just so it reminds us
that we’re going to take the integral with
respect to z first. And let’s say we’ll do y next. And then we’ll do x. So this integral, this value,
as I’ve written it, will figure out the volume of a
column given any x and y. It’ll be a function of x and y,
but since we’re dealing with all constants here, it’s
actually going to be a constant value. It’ll be the constant value
of the volume of one of these columns. So essentially, it’ll
be 2 times dy dx. Because the height of one
of these columns is 2, and then its with and
its depth is dy and dx. So then if we want to figure
out the entire volume– what we did just now is we figured
out the height of a column. So then we could take those
columns and sum them in the y direction. So if we’re summing in the y
direction, we could just take another integral of this
sum in the y direction. And y goes from 0 to what?
y goes from 0 to 4. I wrote this integral a
little bit too far to the left, it looks strange. But I think you get the idea. y is equal to 0, to
y is equal to 4. And then that’ll give us the
volume of a sheet that is parallel to the zy plane. And then all we have left to do
is add up a bunch of those sheets in the x direction, and
we’ll have the volume of our entire figure. So to add up those sheets,
we would have to sum in the x direction. And we’d go from x is equal
to 0, to x is equal to 3. And to evaluate this
is actually fairly straightforward. So, first we’re taking the
integral with respect to z. Well, we don’t have anything
written under here, but we can just assume that
there’s a 1, right? Because dz times dy times
dx is the same thing as 1 times dz times dy dx. So what’s the value
of this integral? Well, the antiderivative
of 1 with respect to z is just z, right? Because the derivative
of z is 1. And you evaluate
that from 2 to 0. So then you’re left with–
so it’s 2 minus 0. So you’re just left with 2. So you’re left with 2, and you
take the integral of that from y is equal to 0, to y is equal
to 4 dy, and then you have the x. From x is equal to 0,
to x is equal to 3 dx. And notice, when we just took
the integral with respect to z, we ended up with
a double integral. And this double integral is the
exact integral we would have done in the previous videos on
the double integral, where you would have just said, well,
z is a function of x and y. So you could have written, you
know, z, is a function of x and y, is always equal to 2. It’s a constant function. It’s independent of x and y. But if you had defined z in
this way, and you wanted to figure out the volume under
this surface, where the surface is z is equal to 2– you
know, this is a surface, is z is equal to 2– we would
have ended up with this. So you see that what we’re
doing with the triple integral, it’s really,
really nothing different. And you might be wondering,
well, why are we doing it at all? And I’ll show you
that in a second. But anyway, to evaluate
this, you could take the antiderivative of this with
respect to y, you get 2y– let me scroll down a little bit. You get 2y evaluating
that at 4 and 0. And then, so you get 2 times 4. So it’s 8 minus 0. And then you integrate
that from, with respect to x from 0 to 3. So that’s 8x from 0 to 3. So that’ll be equal to
24 four units cubed. So I know the obvious question
is, what is this good for? Well, when you have a kind
of a constant value within the volume, you’re right. You could have just done
a double integral. But what if I were to tell you,
our goal is not to figure out the volume of this figure. Our goal is to figure out
the mass of this figure. And even more, this volume–
this area of space or whatever– its mass
is not uniform. If its mass was uniform, you
could just multiply its uniform density times its volume,
and you’d get its mass. But let’s say the
density changes. It could be a volume of some
gas or it could be even some material with different
compounds in it. So let’s say that its density
is a variable function of x, y, and z. So let’s say that the density–
this row, this thing that looks like a p is what you normally
use in physics for density– so its density is a function
of x, y, and z. Let’s– just to make it
simple– let’s make it x times y times z. If we wanted to figure out the
mass of any small volume, it would be that volume times
the density, right? Because density– the units of
density are like kilograms per meter cubed. So if you multiply it times
meter cubed, you get kilograms. So we could say that the mass–
well, I’ll make up notation, d mass– this isn’t a function. Well, I don’t want to write it
in parentheses, because it makes it look like a function. So, a very differential mass,
or a very small mass, is going to equal the density at that
point, which would be xyz, times the volume of that
of that small mass. And that volume of that small
mass we could write as dv. And we know that dv is the
same thing as the width times the height times the depth. dv doesn’t always have to
be dx times dy times dz. If we’re doing other
coordinates, if we’re doing polar coordinates, it could be
something slightly different. And we’ll do that eventually. But if we wanted to figure out
the mass, since we’re using rectangular coordinates, it
would be the density function at that point times our
differential volume. So times dx dy dz. And of course, we can
change the order here. So when you want to figure out
the volume– when you want to figure out the mass– which I
will do in the next video, we essentially will have to
integrate this function. As opposed to just
1 over z, y and x. And I’m going to do that
in the next video. And you’ll see that it’s really
just a lot of basic taking antiderivatives and avoiding
careless mistakes. I will see you in
the next video. ## 61 thoughts on “Triple integrals 1 | Double and triple integrals | Multivariable Calculus | Khan Academy”

1. Rob Johansen says:

cuboid, but thanks for the tutorials 😀

2. polishedblubery says:

maybe hes just really good with the mouse.

3. Maria Lujan Tringaniello says:

Is very confuse the explication

4. boardinshorty811 says:

maybe if you understood English you would understand easier?
I think you mean "this is a very confusing explanation"

5. boardinshorty811 says:

he uses a tablet… he says so on his bio.

6. Maria Lujan Tringaniello says:

Yes, it's true, I try to say very confusing explanation, I just believe the problem to solve is very easier and seem me the explanation was complex. Excuse me if I offend someone, I just to say my opinion. Lienciada Lujan Tringaniello, Universidad de La Plata, Argentina

7. Evelynn Gonzalez says:

this is so hellpful! thsnks!

8. Fermixx says:

@lujan2608 licenciada en que? se puede saber?
porque en general en las matematicas se explican las cosas con ejemplos sencillos. Independientemente de eso, no le veo lo complicado a la explicacion, es en realidad lo que uno hace cuando integra, y bastante bien lo esta explicando.

mucho mejor que decir "suma 1 al exponente y dividi por el exponente resultante" sin mostrarte nada mas

saludos

9. Maria Lujan Tringaniello says:

Cuando llegues a ver esos temas veras que son muy faciles en verdad y no me dedico a subir videos en la web sino a explicarles a mis alumnos de la universidad. Saludos

10. anakore2 says:

fak yu bich

11. Timon van der berg says:

@lujan2608

You totally missed the point. This video is an introduction to tripple integrals. He is using a problem that is easy to solve without a tripple integral to make it easier to understand how a tripple integral works. Ofcourse this is not the kind of thing you would normally use a tripple integral for.

12. robo2000nitro says:

with your help im going to ace all my assignments thank you for the vids

13. dave v says:

@naseltzer its called a graphics tablet

14. alex jhon guevara segura says:

ola un pekeño favor traducelo españolll…

15. Pierre Garamendi Marquez says:

no hay un video en youtube de integrales triples (en español y bueno), maldicion!

16. Shintsui says:

how the hell do you dislike this?

17. LegenDerryk says:

and not 2 because the z boundary is 2 ?

18. VanishedFade says:

Hmm this is similar to Double Integrals plus there is a z-axis.

19. ATERIFA says:

@Obamanation154 dont be stupid. Its clearly Math10B lololol

20. dricedt says:

@ATERIFA agreed, it clearly is 10B!

21. Jacob Lancostellard says:

@Porongaz4 mejor aprende inglés amigo, te ayudará en tu carrera montones.

22. Jacob Lancostellard says:

Thanks a lot dude, this has been very helpful. Keep making math videos like this please!

23. milkykungnaja says:

Truly useful and professionally explained.tyvm mate B-)

24. Nico Nikko says:

25. Ademola Apata says:

My Hero..You are the reason why i survived engineering calculus

26. Nua Nicaj says:

this is not a cube

27. Adrian Cacencu says:

Actually, I had a math teacher that could write as well as in pen with the mouse. When I went to his place for private paid lessons, he wrote In paint instead of a blackboard.

28. Nick Rome says:

Could you do this as a double integral where you say f(x,y)=2 ?

29. Faggythefaggot says:

Commutative*

30. Altavas237 says:

it does exist and youll come up with a 4 spatial dimensional integral (4d figure)

31. Ryan U says:

"Private paid lessons" lol, suuuuuure

32. NothingButLuigi says:

This video was really helpful. I'm finishing my PHD in Triple Integrals this year, and this vid helped me along with my thesis.

33. BlacKNyT says:

actually its a cuboid at first

34. BlacKNyT says:

may be mouse.

35. Kyle Hoffman says:

I believe you meant multiplication is commutative

36. alaa ashraf says:

hi thank you very much for that

37. Vein Vice says:

38. Lai Wei says:

briliant!

39. Fun with Kota says:

Great tutor

40. luis fuentes says:

Khan rules

41. xuanan tang says:

Why z=2y

42. Akhil Gandu says:

a parallelopiped

43. Gabriela Souza says:

show

44. SHRIDHAR SHENOY says:

thanks for the clear explanation

45. opt liquid says:

this would extremely help in time, using a cheap stylus to cut time on your amazing videos without using a mouse…for reasons of time, to bring to the masses faster methods of explanation the details of math…or anything else that you would intend to promote to the masses….

46. Adnan Jamil says:

I wonder at what level this math is taught in the US. In Sweden, this is something one would learn at the university level. Probably only in math-heavy majors like engineering.

47. EDUARDO12348 says:

I love triple integrals…!

48. anonymous traveller says:

Who da fook said tripple integral gives us volume😡😢😴it gives us mass😂

49. anonymous traveller says:

Integration is nothing but summation dont say its an area.never ever ever nevver.

50. Mohamad El Ghouti says:

what kind of people would press the dislike button for such a video. Thanks Sal (Ultimate Respect :))

51. qumar zaman mughal says:

salam to u

52. John Batchler says:

This what launch the space shuttle

53. ugottalovepenguins says:

Thank you Khan Academy! Your videos are always really help me visualise math. Triple integrals make sense now!

54. Ananya Kaushik says:

My hero

55. RokettoJanpu says:

p =/= rho 🙂

56. Yunfei Chen says:

why would you choose triple integral over double integral seems pointless to me……

57. Yunfei Chen says:

well i know as a fact that this is not part of calculus 12 in Canada….. it is first year of university in Canada….

58. Rohith Nekkanti says:

Very good

59. Chakrapani Varkale says:

Thank you.

60. Kevin vs. Gamingz says:

∭ are fun

61. ๓єєt թคtєl valam says:

AMAZING REPRENSENTATION